1:59:03
prone to affecting acts.''
1:59:08
l ask you a question:
1:59:10
Can such personality develop
a delirious idea?
1:59:16
lt certainly can!
1:59:17
Through the trial l've been listening
carefully to what the defendant said.
1:59:23
Some moments
of her unfortunate life story
1:59:27
had moved me to tears.
1:59:29
But the defendant's persistent claims
that even if she's given 100 years
1:59:34
she will dig up the deceased anyway,
1:59:38
the strange categoricalness
of that declaration
1:59:43
go beyond obsessive ideas
and simply turn into delirium.
1:59:47
And delirium is a symptom
of mental disturbance.
1:59:52
Meanwhile, the law forbids to bring
a mentally disturbed person to trial.
1:59:58
lt's necessary that our
authoritative doctors and experts
2:00:04
should have their say.
2:00:06
l earnestly request the court
2:00:10
that the defendant be sent to
a hospital for another examination.
2:00:18
Your Honor!
2:00:20
l'm surprised at the superficiality
of my colleague's reasoning.
2:00:24
''Can the defendant develop
a delirious idea?''
2:00:27
he poses
an unexpected question.
2:00:31
And he answers it himself:
''She certainly can.''
2:00:36
He paints the picture of a person
possessed by delirious ideas,
2:00:41
about whom it is written clearly:
''She is not mentally ill.''
2:00:45
l hope my colleague will excuse me,
but such perfunctory judgement
2:00:48
of the fate of a long-suffering person
is a patent sacrilege.
2:00:54
The severe mental trauma,
the abnormal living conditions
2:00:59
had affected the defendant's health