1:16:03
While youre looking at this tape,
recall the evidence of Mr Simms
1:16:07
where he concurred,
because of this experiment,
1:16:10
a dingo could take out
a baby goat from a suit
1:16:14
while undoing only the two top buttons.
1:16:17
And is therefore reasonable to assume
1:16:19
that a dingo eating
a baby human being out of its suit...
1:16:25
is quite within the bounds of probability.
1:16:32
Hows our side doing?
1:16:34
Well, we figure were up against about
four not-guiltys and four dont-knows.
1:16:38
- The women are the big problem.
- Remind them where they live.
1:16:46
Professor Cameron, in your view is there
any evidence on those articles of clothing
1:16:51
which suggests the child
was killed by a dingo?
1:16:57
I saw no evidence
on these garments to suggest
1:17:00
a member of the canine family
was involved.
1:17:03
In your opinion, is there any evidence
suggesting the child was not killed
1:17:07
by a member of the canine family?
1:17:09
There is evidence to suggest there was
an incised wound around the neck.
1:17:13
In other words, a cut throat.
1:17:15
(public gasps)
1:17:19
This photograph was taken
using ultraviolet light.
1:17:22
You can see the pattern
of bloodied fingers.
1:17:27
And here, what may be a thumb. Its
the impression of a hand of a small adult.
1:17:33
- Thats a thumb?
- If thats a hand, Im a virgin.
1:17:38
Would you align your finger along the
mark that impressed Professor Cameron?
1:17:45
I object to that. The hand is flat.
1:17:48
Noted.
1:17:50
How many smudges do you see?
1:17:53
One, two, three, four.
1:17:56
Would you hold your finger up, please?
1:17:59
One, two, three.