Class Action
prev.
play.
mark.
next.

:39:05
Michael McKinley Grazier.
:39:08
Mr. Grazier, I understand you are
in charge of legal affairs for Argo

:39:12
in the firm of Quinn Califan and Lunt.
:39:14
I'm the chief legal liaison
between Argo and my firm.

:39:18
If somebody asks for a safety report on Argo,
someone like me, for instance,

:39:25
you would get it and you would turn
it over to them. Right?

:39:29
Right.
:39:31
All of them. Every single one.
:39:35
Mr. Ward, you have all
the safety research in existence.

:39:42
You mean there might be a report
that is no longer in existence?

:39:46
There might be eight-legged mice on Venus.
That's another question I can't answer.

:39:52
Very easy for you to make jokes.
You have both your arms and legs.

:39:56
- Objection! Argumentative.
- Sustained.

:40:00
Opposing counsel's not suggested anything
that justifies keeping Mr. Grazier on the stand.

:40:06
- Isn't it time to move on?
- I'm leaning in that direction.

:40:10
Please get to the point.
:40:11
Mr. Grazier, do you know of
the existence, now or in the past,

:40:16
of a report calling into question
the safety of the Meridian model?

:40:19
I can't testify on some hypothetical report.
:40:23
It wasn't hypothetical to Dr. Pavel.
He wrote it.

:40:26
- So he says.
- So he says under oath.

:40:32
Do you understand, sir,
that you are testifying under oath?

:40:35
- Yes, I do.
- And that perjury is grounds for disbarment?

:40:38
Mr. Ward, I find that objectionable.
I do know the law.

:40:42
So do I. You're using semantics when
all you have to do is answer a question.

:40:47
- Did you see that report? Yes or no?
- Objection! The question has been answered.

:40:52
- It's been asked and has not been answered.
- Overruled.

:40:55
Yes or no? I think you're being evasive!
:40:58
I'm not.
I'm answering the questions you're asking.


prev.
next.