1:18:02
You never saw
his picture in the paper?
1:18:04
I don't read the paper.
1:18:07
Is it your sworn testimony,
that by coincidence alone...
1:18:11
you happened to date
both Andrew Marsh...
1:18:13
who died from a combination
of sex and drugs...
1:18:16
and the doctor who treated him
for drug poisoning?
1:18:19
Portland's a small city.
1:18:22
I even dated a man
who dated a woman you dated.
1:18:30
Do you think you're capable...
1:18:31
of just answering
the questions put to you?
1:18:34
I'm just trying
to explain myself.
1:18:41
The night
of Mr. Marsh's death...
1:18:43
were you watching
a pornographic videotape...
1:18:46
you'd made of yourselves?
1:18:47
Objection as
to the characterization!
1:18:50
An explicit videotape?
1:18:53
Andrew used to say...
1:18:55
"Why watch strangers
when you can watch friends?"
1:19:04
If you had
finished having sex...
1:19:06
and Mr. Marsh
was asleep as you stated...
1:19:08
why was the VCR still on
when the police arrived?
1:19:11
Because I forgot
to turn it off before I left.
1:19:13
Because Andrew Marsh
was already dead...
1:19:15
and you were in a hurry
to make your exit?
1:19:17
Objection!
Argumentative isn't the word...
1:19:19
for counsel's approach
to cross.
1:19:21
Sustained.
Watch yourself, Mr. Garrett.
1:19:26
Miss Carlson...
1:19:27
you stated that
you handcuffed Andrew Marsh...
1:19:30
before having sex with him
the night of his death.
1:19:32
It wasn't before. It was during.
1:19:39
I stand corrected. Thank you.
1:19:43
Did you engage
in any other forms...
1:19:44
of dominance with the victim?
1:19:46
Did you, for example, beat him?
1:19:48
Objection!
1:19:50
The specifics of
the sexual relationship...
1:19:52
between the victim
and the defendant...
1:19:54
have no bearing
on the charges against her.
1:19:56
The state has
an obvious interest...
1:19:58
in a pattern of abuse...
1:19:59
that ended with
the death of the victim.