1:11:49
Your paper has mentioned
Munch's paintings as
1:11:54
"confused and inarticulate, dreadful
1:11:58
"or nauseating distortions."
1:12:00
- Yes
- Isn't that rather strong language?
1:12:05
Yes, it is. What we feel
about Munch's painting is expressed
1:12:11
in a footnote I added personally
to our review:
1:12:17
"It is true that the public is annoyed
by these disgusting works.
1:12:23
"How regrettable then that
such exhibitions draw full houses.
1:12:29
"An empty gallery would be the best way
to control these extravagances."
1:12:36
I agree with Aftenposten.
This is not art, it is dirt.