:11:02
Charges were in a sealed envelope,
nobody saw them.
:11:04
- Not even at the hearing? - He was
declared guilty without a trial...
:11:07
...and told if he wanted
to keep his job...
:11:09
...he had to denounce his father
and his sister. Thank you, Natalie.
:11:12
- His sister?
- He told them to take a hike.
:11:16
Let's send Joe and Charlie down there,
see if he's any good on camera.
:11:20
Is he being brought
before the Committee?
:11:23
No.
:11:25
Then it's not McCarthy.
:11:28
Isn't it?
:11:35
Milo Radulovich.
:11:40
What happens to your children...
:11:42
...your 5-year-old and your 5-month-old
in terms of you?
:11:45
If I am being judged
on my relatives...
:11:48
...are my children going
to be asked to denounce me?
:11:53
Are they going to be judged
on what their father was labeled?
:11:58
Are they going to have to explain
to their friends, etc...
:12:03
...why their father
is a security risk?
:12:06
If the thing is let stand
as it, the first recommendation...
:12:11
...was sent out by the board,
I see a chain reaction that...
:12:15
...has no end to anybody,
for anybody.
:12:24
Well, that's new.
:12:27
You can't call this
a neutral piece.
:12:28
The other side's been represented
rather well for the last 2 years.
:12:31
The Air Force
hasn't gone on the record.
:12:33
So you want to forego the standards
you've stuck to for 15 years...
:12:36
...both sides, no commentary.
:12:37
- We all editorialize. - I'm just
making sure we identify what...
:12:40
We're giving them
the information up front...
:12:42
...and we're asking them
to comment on it.
:12:44
Frank, hold on.
:12:45
I've searched my conscience.
:12:47
I can't for the life of me
find any justification for this.
:12:50
I simply cannot accept
that there are, on every story...
:12:53
...two equal and logical sides
to an argument.
:12:55
- Call it editorializing, if you'd like.
- It is editorializing.
:12:58
They'll have equal time
to defend themselves.