:07:01
l say again, in error
predicting the fault.
:07:04
l know this sounds rather incredible,
but this conclusion is based on...
:07:09
... the results from our twin
9000 computer.
:07:12
We're skeptical, and we're running
cross-checking routines...
:07:16
... to determine reliability
of this conclusion.
:07:19
Sorry about this little snag.
:07:20
We'll get this info to you
as soon as we work it out.
:07:23
X-ray delta one,
this is Mission Control.
:07:26
Two-zero-four-nine.
Transmission concluded.
:07:33
l hope the two of you
are not concerned about this.
:07:36
No, I'm not, HaI.
:07:38
Are you quite sure?
:07:40
-Yeah. I'd Iike to ask you a question.
-Of course.
:07:44
How do you account for the discrepancy
between you and the twin 9000?
:07:48
Well, l don 't think there is
any question about it.
:07:52
lt can only be
attributable to human error.
:07:56
This sort of thing
has cropped up before...
:07:59
...and it has always
been due to human error.
:08:06
Listen, HaI. . .
:08:08
. . .there's never been
any instance at aII. . .
:08:10
. . .of a computer error
occurring in a 9000 Series, has there?
:08:13
None whatsoever, Frank.
:08:15
The 9000 Series has
a perfect operational record.
:08:19
I know the wonderfuI achievements
of the 9000 Series, but. . . .
:08:24
Are you certain there's never been even
the most insignificant computer error?
:08:29
None whatsoever, Frank.
:08:31
Quite honestly, l wouldn 't
worry myself about that.
:08:39
WeII, I'm sure you're right, HaI.
:08:43
Fine. Thanks very much.
:08:48
I'm having troubIe
with my transmitter in C-pod.
:08:51
WouId you come down
and take a Iook at it with me?
:08:53
See you Iater, HaI.