:31:00
46th trial.
:31:01
Of those 46 trials...
:31:03
...how many times have you testified
the defendant was legally insane?
:31:07
Objection!
:31:08
The doctor cannot be asked...
:31:10
...to recall all of his testimony
at those trials. It's absurd.
:31:14
Overruled.
:31:17
Thank you.
:31:19
I can't remember.
:31:21
Could the reason you
can't remember be...
:31:23
...that in 1 1 years and 46 trials...
:31:26
...you never saw a defendant
whom you found insane?
:31:30
I can't recall at this time.
:31:34
Can you recall testifying
at Dan Baker's trial?
:31:36
Objection! This has nothing to
do with the proceedings here.
:31:40
Overruled.
:31:42
This better be good.
:31:44
Thank you.
:31:46
I'll ask again.
:31:48
Can you recall testifying
at the trial of Dan Baker?
:31:51
It's a rather brutal double homicide
where you found the defendant sane?
:31:58
A dissenting psychiatrist
disagreed with you.
:32:01
And Mr. Baker was found insane
and institutionalized.
:32:04
Where is he currently?
:32:06
At Whitfield.
:32:07
Who is the chief psychiatrist there?
:32:10
I am.
:32:11
You are.
:32:13
Dr. Rodeheaver is the
chief psychiatrist.
:32:17
Now help me make this clear to the jury.
:32:20
In 1985, you testified that Dan Baker...
:32:23
...was legally sane.
:32:25
The jury disagreed with you.
:32:27
And Mr. Baker was found not
guilty by reason of insanity.
:32:31
Since then he has been a patient in your
hospital as a paranoid schizophrenic.
:32:36
Is that correct?
:32:38
Do you normally admit patients...
:32:40
...keep and treat them for 10
years if they are of sound mind?
:32:44
No.
:32:45
Then it would be fair to say...
:32:48
...that you find insane people
sane for the purposes of trial?
:32:52
Objection! Argumentative!
:32:55
Withdraw the question.
Nothing further.