I.Q.
prev.
play.
mark.
next.

:33:02
And it's not about what you do,
it's about who you are.

:33:06
I've Iearned that from you, so thank you.
:33:17
- Fake!
- AIbert, what's going on?

:33:23
Catherine has just found out
that Edward is not reaIIy a scientist.

:33:28
He is simpIy an automobiIe mechanic.
:33:32
What does a mechanic know
about coId fusion?

:33:35
- Nothing. It's aII a big Iie.
- ApriI FooI's.

:33:41
- We meant no harm.
- Just fooIish oId men.

:33:44
I was right about the coId fusion,
wasn't I?

:33:46
Do you reaIise you proved concIusiveIy
that my approach is impossibIe?

:33:52
I knew that, but you said...
:33:55
I meant that I couId not prove it
or disprove it, so I couId not pubIish it.

:34:02
- I did something you couIdn't do?
- It's mathematics.

:34:06
- I was aIways terribIe at mathematics.
- Professor.

:34:14
Ed WaIters' atomic fueI theory.
:34:17
An unpubIished paper of AIbert
Einstein's, written 30 years ago.

:34:22
GentIemen, they are identicaI.
:34:26
In every respect, identicaI.
:34:29
- You accuse Ed WaIters of pIagiarism?
- HardIy.

:34:33
I am accusing Ed WaIters, and Professor
Einstein, and his coIIeagues...

:34:39
...of...
:34:43
...of outright fraud.
CoId fusion is nothing more than a hoax.

:34:48
Mr President!
:34:53
If you wiII pIease bear with us,
Professor Einstein has a statement.

:34:58
Thank you, Mr President.

prev.
next.